The Prehistoric Alignment of World Wonders

topic posted Thu, December 1, 2005 - 4:32 PM by  Abraxas
Blow your mind:
home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/index.html

Exerpts:
--"Great circles are straight lines that go all the way around the center of the earth. The equator is a great circle. Meridians of longitude that cross over the north and south poles are also great circles."

--"Easter Island, Nazca, Ollantaytambo, Paratoari, Tassili n'Ajjer and Giza are all aligned on a single great circle. Additional ancient sites that are located within one tenth of one degree of this great circle include Petra; Perseopolis; Khajuraho; Pyay, Sukothai and Anatom Island."

--"The relationship between the distances from Angkor Vihear to the Great Pyramid and from the Great Pyramid to the Nazcan Hummingbird is also a precise expression of φ:

4,754 x 1.618 = 7,692

Because the Hummingbird and Angkor Vihear are antipodal sites, with a distance between them of one-half of the circumference of the earth, two Golden Section relationships between these three sites are shown by the circumference of the earth along the line of ancient sites."

--"Percentage of circumference:__First three digits of Fibonacci numbers:
Angkor to Giza: 19.1%________#137: 191... (Prime)
Giza to Nazca: 30.9%_________#138: 309...
Nazca to Angkor: 50.0%_______#139: 500...

Distance between sites:_______First five digits of Fibonacci numbers:
Angkor to Giza: 4,754 miles____#359: 47542... (Prime)
Giza to Nazca: 7,692 miles_____#360: 76924...
Nazca to Angkor: 12,446 miles__#361: 12446..."

--"Easter Island is triangular and the three volcanic peaks on Easter form an isosceles triangle with an apex angle of 108° and base angles of 36°. The ratio between the length of the base and the lengths of the sides is φ (6.8 miles x 1.618 = 11 miles)."

--"The straight line distance, through the Earth, from Angkor Wat to Easter (7,574 miles), plus the straight line distance from Easter to Macchupicchu (2,522 miles), equals the great circle distance from Angkor Wat to Easter (10,096 miles).

The straight line distance from the Great Pyramid to Easter (7,566 miles) is three times the straight line distance from Easter to Machupicchu (2,522 miles).

The straight line distance from Easter to its antipodal point in the Indus Valley (7,924 miles), which is also the diameter of the Earth, is 3.1416 times the straight line distance from Easter to Machupicchu (2,522 miles), a precise expression of π.

Since the circumference of the Earth is also 3.1416 times the diameter of the Earth, the straight line distance from Easter to Machupicchu times π² equals the circumference of the Earth."

--"As the Earth rotates on it’s axis, the Equator remains aligned, but the line of ancient sites describes a sine wave as a result of it’s tilt relative to the Equator. The line of the ecliptic may be observed describing a similar wave by spinning a globe that has a line of the ecliptic.

The wavelength is equal to the circumference of the Earth. The amplitude of this wave, measured from the middle of the wave (the equator), is 30° of latitude. Recall that the 30th parallels are ½ of the height of each hemisphere, or ½ of the radius of the Earth.

Since the height of the wave is equal to ½ of the Earth’s radius, the ratio between the wavelength and it’s amplitude is 4π. Measuring the amplitude from the top of the wavelength to the bottom (from 30° N to 30° S), the amplitude is equal to the radius of the Earth, and the ratio between the wavelength and the amplitude is 2π."

--"The old urban centers on the Eastern Seaboard of the U.S are in nearly perfect alignment.

This great circle line crosses through the middle of Washington DC and the middle of Boston, and it crosses right over the middle of New York City. It also crosses over Philadelphia and the Baltimore waterfront. The azimuth of this line as it crosses over NYC is 52°, which is also the angle of the sides of the Great Pyramid.

The alignment crosses between Teotihuacan and Cholula in Mexico and just as this alignment crosses into Mexico from the gulf it crosses over the ancient city of El Tajin and the pyramid of niches. The alignment also crosses over Baalbek, Lebanon and just north of the ancient city of Troy. The alignment also crosses over Stonehenge. The azimuth of the alignment as it crosses over Stonehenge is 72° west of due north and 72° east of due south, which is not the same as the primary alignment of Stonehenge itself. However, the alignment from the center of Stonehenge to the center of the heel stone is 52° east of due north, which is the same as the azimuth of this global alignment as it crosses over New York City and the same as the angle of the Great Pyramid.

In addition to the cities on the Eastern Seaboard and the ancient sites listed above, this alignment also crosses over a number of other major cities of the modern era, including Mexico City, the national capital of Mexico; Mobile, Alabama; Atlanta, Georgia; London, the national capital of England; Lille, France, Stuttgart and Munich in southern Germany; Zagreb, the national capital of Croatia; Belgrade, the national capital of Serbia; Sofia, the national capital of Bulgaria; Beirut, the national capital of Lebanon; Damascus, the national capital of Syria; and Riyadh, the national capital of Saudi Arabia."
posted by:
Abraxas
SF Bay Area
  • Re: The Prehistoric Alignment of World Wonders

    Fri, December 2, 2005 - 11:34 AM
    Very interesting post Abraxas. I just finished reading The Atlantis Blueprint by Colin Wilson and Rand Flem-Ath. It discusses this same idea at length and shows without a doubt that many of these ancient sites are placed on a grid when using the Great Pyramid as the prime meridian. I just wonder how much longer the establishment can deny the existence of a prehistoric worldwide civilization that had extensive geodedic knowledge and the impressive technological capabilities required to build the megalithic structures found all over our planet!

    Gary
    • Re: The Prehistoric Alignment of World Wonders

      Fri, December 2, 2005 - 6:54 PM
      Didn't Drumvalo speak about this in his Flower of Life volumes? He mixed up alot of bad or wrong info with some interesting theories though.Seems to me he was talking about constellation patterns...excuse me. Stephen new pics at our site
  • Re: The Prehistoric Alignment of World Wonders

    Fri, May 12, 2006 - 11:32 AM
    Just a thought . . . although I am very much interested in these theories . . . I'm perplexed at the use of 'miles' and the suggestion that the relating figures may appear to match significant mathematical expressions and numbers.

    Miles were invented by the Roman's and as such post-date many of the civilisations mentioned; who would have been using other measures of distance - Such as the cubit in Egypt, etc . . .

    Angles on the other hand dont suffer from the same fate . . .

    Any thoughts,

    Namaste,

    Dave

Recent topics in "sacred geometry"